You can use "co-first author" when more than one person is the first author of a paper. Corresponding author or correspondence author is the supervisor of your research from whom all the directions and instructions of research and paper writing come. However, the last place in the author list is usually reserved for a PI/senior researcher, who has his name on dozens of papers every year. As long as you care about the reader, I would use the first author… The first named is often termed the senior author. First author is often also referred as the presenting author. Referring to a paper as (Famous Researcher, 2018) tells very little about the actual paper you are talking about. She has published work as lead or senior author in excellent journals in the areas of xxx Dr xxx is first author of 20, second author of 6 and last author of 5. The first author named on the paper is thus the person who has contributed intelectually the most to the paper. She has published work as lead or senior author in excellent journals in the areas of xxx Dr xxx is first author of 20, second author of 6 and last author of 5. The corresponding author has the "privilege" of being corresponded with.

@Jizhong Wan, first co-author and co-first author have completely different meanings. However, "first co-author" would mean that this person is not the first author, but has done a significant amount of work, more than the other co-authors. Co-first author and CVs Posted: February 27, 2012 in Academia, Publishing. A corresponding author is the individual who, when working on a paper with multiple authors, takes primary responsibility for communicating with the journal you intend to publish in.

If more than one person can be considered first author, those names are listed alphabetically and a note to the fact is made in the acknowledgement. He recently published a paper in which his name was second but had the ole’ asterisk next to it indicating he and the listed first author had made an equal contribution. He has performed elegant studies using clinical and administrative data which were published in excellent journals, many as first author and more recently as senior author. In reality, there's no particular extra god-like awe involved in being either listed first -some author lists are simply alphabetical- or in being the one dumped with the task of answering letters. However, in many disciplines, such as the life sciences, the last author in a group is the principle investigator—the person who supervised the work. A countervailing and more modern Authorship conventions are based around assumptions that research was done under the umbrella of a research institution. When a large multi-author group has conducted the work, the group ideally should decide who will be an author before the work is started and confirm who is an author before submitting the manuscript for publication. Still, I’ve had senior faculty members tell me that, even though they look at the contribution narratives, they still expect to see first-author and then senior-author … First author is usually the student /researcher who has undertaken the research work.

The Contact Author by default will be the first person added to the author list (but not necessarily the author ordered first in the list). The corresponding author does not need to be the first author or a senior author. The proposed “first author, second author, et int, and last author” system would not be ideal for papers in which authors are listed solely from largest con-tribution to smallest. The “first author” is a coveted position because of the increased visibility.

It’s often just fine to assume that the first author did the most work, and the last author is the senior author who is the PI of the lab that enabled the project. In reality, there's no particular extra god-like awe involved in being either listed first -some author lists are simply alphabetical- or in being the one dumped with the task of answering letters. The submitter will not have the ability to specifically select the Contact Author. The first author named on the paper is thus the person who has contributed intelectually the most to the paper. Standard. Kakoli Majumder Senior Writer&Editor Editage Insights Traditionally, the first author contributes most and also receives most of the credit, whereas the position of subsequent authors is usually decided by contribution, alphabetical order, or reverse seniority. You can use "co-first author" when more than one person is the first author of a paper. This author is the first name readers will see, and because of various citation rules, the first author may be the only name visible.

The corresponding author has the "privilege" of being corresponded with. The author who most substantially worked on the draft article and the underlying research becomes the first author.

The first named is often termed the senior author. If more than one person can be considered first author, those names are listed alphabetically and a note to the fact is made in the acknowledgement.